Dec 16, 2017 Last Updated 11:30 PM, Dec 15, 2017

Is Overwatch Worth Your Money?

Published in Editorial
Read 2537 times
Rate this item
(0 votes)
Tagged under

The term “value” has become a staple when discussing video games.

It pops up in almost every comment section and forum thread on the internet. It seems the only thing people are concerned with, these days, is how much value they are going to get out of their purchase. It’s the reason we always see questions about how big the game map is going to be for Fallout 4 or The Witcher 3 before launch. How many quests will there be? How many NPC’s and towns for us to interact? How many hours will the single player campaign last? Unfortunately, there are a lot of gamers who won’t be satisfied with their sixty dollar purchase unless the game can provide hundreds of hours of gameplay, even though historically speaking, games are cheaper than ever, and God forbid a developer to try to charge for a multiplayer-only experience.

Enter, Overwatch.

Overwatch launched last week to massive critical acclaim. Admittedly, this was expected considering Activision Blizzard developed it. What wasn’t expected, however, was the inexplicably low user score showcased on Metacritic. When I noticed that, it peaked my curiosity enough to force myself to read through the cesspool that is the Metacritic negative user review section in search of an answer to this anomaly. As it turns out, a lot of people were complaining about the perceived lack of content in the game at launch. Arguments like, “The game only has 12 maps,” and “There is no sense of character progression” were some of the most popular. However, none of those statements were as prominent as the granddaddy of them all, the bandwagon statement of 2016, “No single player campaign? No sixty dollars.”

This statement irks me to no end.

The “no single player campaign” argument has been used in every conversation about a multiplayer focused game in recent memory. It happened to Titanfall, Evolve, Rainbow Six: Siege, and Star Wars: Battlefront, all of which were good games in their own right, and it’s happening again to Overwatch.
Overwatch is an over the top throwback to the old school arena shooter. It doesn’t need a single player campaign to be a worthwhile experience. It would be like saying, “The Witcher 3 may have kept me busy for 100 hours, but it’s not worth my money because it has no multiplayer component.” The statement fails to judge the game based on its own merits. It’s lazy. It’s a blanket statement leveled at multiplayer games by people who probably weren’t looking to play a multiplayer game in the first place.

Maybe I’m stuck in the past, but I remember a time before Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 where people played round after round of Unreal Tournament and Quake III: Arena, just because it was fun as hell.

Overwatch is worth sixty bucks because it’s fun. And isn’t that why we play games, to have fun, to experience something new each time we play them? It’s time to start judging games based on the experiences we have with them and not on the perceived, “value” we see them for. I don’t go to a movie and demand a refund after realizing it wasn’t over three hours long. I don’t rage in the comment sections of Goodreads because the new Stephen King novel didn’t keep me busy as long as War and Peace. And I most certainly do not rate The Witcher 3 a zero on Metacritic because it didn’t have a multiplayer component.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m gonna play some more Overwatch.

Geoffrey Moore

Geoffrey has been playing games since we was 2 years old when he hit a homerun in an NES Baseball game. Since that time he's been gaming on anything he could get his hands on. That includes all of the consoles, and for the past six years, PC gaming, now his platform of choice. When he's not gaming, Geoffrey enjoys playing guitar, watching movies, and writing short creative fiction. He loves all things nerd and geek culture, and always have his eye on the next big thing. Writing is his passion and he's happy to share it with you.

Related items

  • Destiny 2 Review

    All the elements are there: you’re gunning down massive hordes of baddies and you’re doing so with outstanding visual fidelity, a variety of weapons, and you’re able to cause this mayhem using big, explosive abilities. But, a bit too much of Destiny 2’s action is watered down by long cooldowns, the lazy sit-behind-cover until you’re full-health again, and the way enemies completely lose their ability to aim once your health hits the blinky-red portion of the on-screen health bar. The stakes always seem so low, the rewards so random and barely earned. It’s not a bad game, but it’s not one that lives up to the lofty expectations set by the way it’s marketed and talked about by its fans.  Miles wide, but an inch deep: Destiny 2 is not the game it should be.

  • What is my story, I wonder?

    Every gamer has her story of creation, his moment of revelation, the guidance of a universe-ordained path that lead to their own grand, epiphanous moment in which they became a gamer. Each one has their own unique testimony that lead to them pressing start for the first time. What is my story, I wonder?

  • Destiny 2 Beta Impressions

    I never played Destiny. While it seemed to check so many of the boxes I wanted in a game, unfortunately, it could only be played on a platform that I didn’t own. A Borderlands-style loot system merged with a Halo-inspired combat experience sounded like a winning combination and, in many ways, it was.

  • Legion, World of Warcraft - AAA Anonymous Epi. 6

    With AAA Anonymous, we discuss our latest AAA game addiction for a handful of months, until the next one replaces it. This episode covers the release of Blizzard's Expansion, Legion, and the welcomed revival of World of Warcraft. For the Horde!

  • Warcraft. And it was very much appreciated.

    Warcraft is a venerable IP, and given the lack of competition, this is the best video game movie I've seen since Wreck it Ralph. Outside of the fantastically well used CGI, this is not a bit of cinema that will be winning any awards. It is the beginning of a franchise, and my determined optimism says that Blizzard and Legendary Pictures could get better at making cinema together. If not, they managed to pen a love letter to their fans that anyone with even an ounce of Warcraft nostalgia should examine – and it was very much appreciated.

  • Heroes of the Storm Beta Review

    Heroes of the Storm does not try to be tremendously complex, nor does it want the player to feel that they've immediately figured out all the nuances of gameplay. Blizzard has a long history of taking a popular genre, finding the three to five most fun things about it, then creating a gameplay experience that fully envelops the player in those facets of the game. They did it with the MMO by making WoW, they did it with the action RPG in the Diablo series, and they're currently doing it with online card games in Hearthstone. So far, this is one hell of an effort to do the same thing to the MOBA genre.